Why science always wins

Soil matters
with Peter Burton
Functional Fertiliser Ltd

Science, according to the Concise Oxford Dictionary, is systematic and formulated knowledge. Primarily it’s about measures, and when it comes to fertiliser it’s about performance measured over time.

Soil fertility programmes here were developed initially from measures taken in the 1940s and 1950s by the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research – known as DSIR – later to become the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, or MAF.

A cornerstone of the work carried out by the various research institutes throughout the country prior to 1990 was providing farmers with the best and most up-to-date information.  There was no commercial influence then, and trial work required the co-operation of several disciplines for a minimum of 10 years.

We regularly now hear of an imminent science breakthrough that will reduce nitrate-N losses and greenhouse gas emissions, while removing excess carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.  

Even if such a breakthrough was discovered right now, it would be several years before sufficient measures could be made in enough practical farm situations to know that it provided a viable alternative to current practice.

No miracle cures

There are no miracle cures about to be released, which means we either continue with current practices and suffer the environmental and financial consequences; or far-reaching regulation is introduced, slashing animal numbers and depriving farmers of their livelihoods.

One possible miracle would be if long-term data from alternative soil fertility programmes were examined to see whether there’s anything of value. It would take maybe 90 days for a team of
researchers to carefully analyse the data, and take enough measures from the properties of long-term users, to know what of value there is to be learned.

There is plenty that can be learned from the work of those outside mainstream, although it will come too late for at least one of the first people to appreciate that a calcium, rather than phosphorus-driven soil fertility system, provided superior results in all respects.

Vaughan Jones, who died recently, was a vociferous advocate of higher-than-usual inputs of lime and soft phosphate rock along with elemental sulphur as the basis for clover-dominant permanent grazed pasture, and time will show he was ahead of his time.

The advantage of the system Vaughan pioneered was steadily increasing pasture growth over time, in contrast to the results from the urea-driven system embraced by many today.

There are plenty of measures to show annual pasture growth has steadily declined with increasing nitrogen use during the last 27 years. It’ll be looked back on as a failed strategy, with damage caused taking decades to recover.

Nitrogen

Nitrogen is an essential growth requirement, as important in calcium-driven systems as in systems reliant on regular N applications. The difference is sufficient N can be made available naturally for pasture growth in excess of 18 tonne DM/ha per year.

And the claim that nitrogen, whether applied in the form of bag N or fixed by clover, is the same doesn’t stand close scrutiny, due to the short length of time, 1994-1996, the study was conducted.

Most pastoral soils on which dairy cows currently graze naturally contain 5000kg-15,000kg N/ha. Only a small percentage is required for plant growth throughout the season with the majority recycled via dung and urine.

As with all nutrients only one to five per cent of the total amount is available at any given time for plant uptake. The key to success of the clover-based system is it is fixed in response to declining plant-available levels, a far more efficient way of supplying N to plants.

When ideal grazing intervals are adopted plants contain more protein and less nitrate, further reducing the amount of N lost to groundwater. The measures are available, and those wanting to scrutinise dispassionately may have access to them.

Total N leached may still be above the strictest standards demanded. However, compared to losses from fertiliser N-dependent systems, the reduction is significant. Not perfection perhaps, but possibly a starting point for scientists aware that there is no single magic button in a multi-factored natural system.

Our experience is that scientists seldom stray far from their centres of work, even when invited. Those of us in the field can assist by providing essential field observations required – if rapid progress that allows farmers to remain viable now and into the future, and the fresh water standards are to be met. For more information, contact Peter on 0800 843 809.

0 Comments

There are no comments on this blog.

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to make a comment. Login Now
Opinion Poll

We're not running a poll right now. Check back soon!